Virtual Learning Assessment: Practical Strategies for Instructors in Higher Education
Keywords:
virtual learning, virtual instruction, higher education institutions, online assessmentAbstract
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36896/3.2fa3
Many universities have been designing and implementing online instruction for years, but the COVID-19 pandemic created an unexpected impetus for the expansion of virtual learning. Instructors and students who may not have previously chosen or experienced online instruction found themselves in need of safe, virtual options, and it appears that the general shift to virtual learning is here to stay. Strong, reliable assessment is a major component of virtual instruction, and instructors have several options for structuring student feedback. This article reviews the relevant literature regarding effective online assessment techniques and makes recommendations for the use of examinations and more authentic assessments, including video demonstrations, group projects, and discussion forums. Various data analytics within Learning Management Systems (LMS) are also explored. Discussion includes implications of online assessment and avenues for important research to strengthen response to this growing need.
References
Balaji, M., & Chakrabarti, D. (2010). Student interactions in online discussion forum: Empirical research from 'media richness theory' perspective. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 9(1), 1-22.
Barnard-Brak, L., & Shiu, W. (2010). Classroom Community Scale in the blended learning environment: A psychometric review. International Journal of E-Learning, 9(3), 303-311. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/30426/
Barry, S. (2012). A video recording and viewing protocol for student group presentations: Assisting self-assessment through a Wiki environment. Computers & Education, 59, 855-860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.008
Corey, D., & Ben-Porath, Y. (2020). Practical guidance on the use of the MMPI instruments in remote psychological testing. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 51(3), 199-204. https://doi.org/10.1037/pro0000329
Everson, M., & Garfield, J. (2008). An innovative approach to teaching online statistics courses. Technology Innovations in Statistics Education, 2(1), 1-18. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2v6124xr https://doi.org/10.5070/T521000031
Gaytan, J., & McEwen, B. (2007). Effective online instructional and assessment strategies. The American Journal of Distance Education, 21(3), 117-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640701341653
Gonzalez, T., Rubia, M. A., Hincz, K. P, Comas-Lopez, Subirats, L., Fort, S., & Sacha, G. M. (2020). Influence of COVID-19 confinement on students' performance in higher education. PLOS ONE, 15(10), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239490
Harmon, O., Lambrinos, J., & Buffolino, J. (2010). Assessment design and cheating risk in online instruction. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 13(3). https://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/Fall133/harmon_lambrinos_buffolino133.html
Johnson, G. (2006). College student psychoeducational functioning and satisfaction with online study groups. Educational Psychology, 26(5), 677-688. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410500390848
Kim, N., Smith, M., & Maeng, K. (2008). Assessment in online distance education: A comparison of three online programs at a university. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 11(1). https://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/spring111/kim111.html
Lonn, S., & Teasley, S. (2009). Saving time or innovating practice: Investigating perceptions and uses of learning management systems. Computers & Education, 53(3), 686-694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.04.008
Mann, J. (2014). A pilot study of RN-BSN completion students' preferred instructor online classroom caring behaviors. The ABNF Journal, 25(2), 33-39.
Marshall, J., Roache, D., & Moody-Marshall, R. (2020) Crisis leadership: A critical examination of educational leadership in higher education in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic. International Studies in Educational Administration, 48(3), 30-37.
McDougall, J. (2015). The quest for authenticity: A study of an online discussion forum and the needs of adult learners. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 55(1), 94-113.
Myyry, L., & Joutsenvirta, T. (2015). Openbook, open-web online examinations: Developing examination practices to support university students' learning and self-efficacy. Active Learning in Higher Education, 16(2), 119-132. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787415574053
Perrotta, K., & Bohan, C. H. (2020). A reflective study of online faculty teaching experiences in higher education. Journal of Effective Teaching in Higher Education, 3(1), 50-66. https://doi.org/10.36021/jethe.v3i1.9
Plante, K., & Asselin, M. (2014). Best practice for creating social presence and caring behaviors online. Nursing Education Perspectives, 35(4), 219-223. https://doi.org/10.5480/13-1094.1
Portolese, L., Krause, J., & Bonner, J. (2016). Timed online tests: Do students perform better with more time? American Journal of Distance Education, 30(4), 264-271. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2016.1234301
Roberts, R., & Davis, M. (2015). Assessment for a model for achieving competency in administration and scoring of the WAISIV in post-graduate psychology students. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00641
Salter, N., & Conneely, M. (2015). Structured and unstructured discussion forums as tools for student engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 46, 18-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.037
Schultz, P., & Quinn, A. (2014). Lights, camera, action! Learning about management with student-produced video assignments. Journal of Management Education, 38(2), 234-258. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562913488371
Seif, G., Brown, D., & Dusti, A. (2013). Videorecorded simulated patient interactions: Can they help develop clinical and communication skills in today's learning environment? Journal of Allied Health, 42(2), 37-44.
Shaw, A. (2019). Authentic assessment in the online classroom. Wiley. https://ctl.wiley.com/authentic-assessment-in-the-onlineclassroom/
Sieber, J. (2005). Misconceptions and realities about teaching online. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11(3), 329-340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-005-0002-7
Stockwell, B., Stockwell, M., Cennamo, M., & Jiang, E. (2015). Blended learning improves science education. Cell, 162(5), 933-936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.08.009
Stowell, J., & Bennett, D. (2010). Effects of online testing on student exam performance and test anxiety. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 42(2), 161-171. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.42.2.b
Talley, C., & Scherer, S. (2013). The enhanced flipped classroom: Increasing academic performance with student-recorded lectures and practice testing in a "flipped" STEM course. Journal of Negro Education, 82(3), 339-347. https://doi.org/10.7709/jnegroeducation.82.3.0339
Tsai, C. (2013). An effective online teaching method: The combination of collaborative learning with initiation and self-regulation learning with feedback. Behaviour & Information Technology, 32(7), 712-723. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2012.667441
Watson, G., & Sottile, J. (2010). Cheating in the digital age: Do students cheat more in online classes? Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 13(1).
You, J. (2016). Identifying significant indicators using LMS data to predict course achievement in online learning. Internet and Higher Education, 29, 23-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.11.003
Young, S. (2006). Student views of effective online teaching in higher education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 20(2), 65-77. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde2002_2
Yurdugul, H., & Menzi Cetin, N. (2015). Investigation of the relationship between learning process and learning outcomes in E-learning environments. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 58, 57-74. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2015.59.4
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
