Fully Scaling Up Corequisite Models in Math: Challenges and Successes

Authors

Keywords:

corequisite models, developmental education, math, student success

Abstract

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36896/4.2fa2

DE programming in higher education should be designed to increase student success, and well-designed corequisite models have shown great potential as an accelerated option for completion of the first college-level course in math. With the support of a Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board grant, Tarleton State University, a member institution of the Texas A&M University System, revamped its developmental education (DE) program to exceed requirements for the Texas Success Initiative by fully scaling up student enrollment in corequisite models to 100%. Along with a multi-pronged approach to help students satisfy any TSI liabilities, Tarleton’s revamped DE program includes holistic advising practices that use multiple measures to inform placement decisions, a robust expansion of corequisite models, refinement of assessment protocols, inclusion of peer mentoring services, and two intervention options to address academic under preparedness and issues with self-efficacy in math. Findings from the first year of implementation were favorable and demonstrated a significant increase in course completion when compared to the previous year. Limitations of this study and areas for future research were also discussed.

Author Biography

  • Laurie A. Sharp, Academic Affairs, Tarleton State University

    currently serves as the assistant vice president for Strategic Academic Initiatives at Tarleton State University in Stephenville, Texas. She also is an associate professor in the College of Education and Human Development and has taught courses in the areas of educational leadership, literacy, and research methods. She has contributed over 100 publications to the field of P–16 education, with a focus on instructional effectiveness and student success.

References

Atkins, C., & Beggs, C. T. (2017). Commuting the math sentence: Accelerating developmental mathematics using the co-requisite model (EJ1178226). ERIC. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1178226.pdf

Bailey, T., Bashford, J., Boatman, A., Squires, J., Weiss, M., Doyle, W., Valentine, J. C., LaSota, R., Polanin, J. R., Spinney, E., Wilson, W., Yeide, M., & Young, S. H. (2016). Strategies for postsecondary students in developmental education - A practice guide for college and university administrators, advisors, and faculty. Institute of Education Sciences, What Works Clearinghouse. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/PracticeGuide/wwc_dev_ed_112916.pdf

Boatman, A. (2012). Evaluating institutional efforts to streamline postsecondary remediation: The causal effects of the Tennessee developmental course redesign initiative on early student academic success. National Center for Postsecondary Research. http://www.postsecondaryresearch.org/publications/BoatmanTNFINAL.pdf

Boatman, A. (2021). Accelerating college remediation: Examining the effects of math course redesign on student academic success. The Journal of Higher Education, 92(6), 927-960. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2021.1888675

Booth, E. A., Capraro, M. M., Capraro, R. M., Chaudhuri, N., Dyer, J., & Marchbanks, M. P., III. (2014). Innovative developmental education programs: A Texas model. Journal of Developmental Education, 38(1), 2-18.

Cullinane, J. (2012). Developmental education structures designed for the readiness continuum: Clarifying the corequisite model (Higher Ed Issue Brief No. 1). The Charles A. Dana Center at The University of Texas at Austin. https://dcmathpathways.org/sites/default/files/resources/2016-11/Higher%20Ed%20Issue%20Brief_July2012.pdf

Daugherty, L., Gomez, C. J., Carew, D. G., Mendoza-Graf, A., & Miller, T. (2018). Designing and implementing corequisite models of developmental education. RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2337.html

https://doi.org/10.7249/RR2337

Deshler, J., Fuller, E., & Darrah, M. (2019). Supporting students through peer mentoring in developmental mathematics. The Learning Assistance Review, 24(1), 87-112.

Ganga, E., & Mazzariello, A. (2019). Modernizing college course placement by using multiple measures. Education Commission of the States. https://www.ecs.org/wp-content/uploads/Modernizing-College-Course-Placement-by-Using-Multiple-Measures.pdf

H.B. 2223, 85th Leg., Reg. Sess. (Tex. 2017).

Jaynes, C., Barrientos, M., & Humphrey, W. (2020). The evolution of the T-Section: Angelo State University's approach to the corequisite model. Journal of College Academic Support Programs, 2(2), 53-56. https://journals.tdl.org/jcasp/index.php/jcasp/issue/view/17/8

https://doi.org/10.36896/2.2pp3

Logue, A. W., Douglas, D., & Watanabe-Rose, M. (2019). Corequisite mathematics remediation: Results over time and in different contexts. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 41(3), 294-315. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373719848777

Logue, A. W., Watanabe-Rose, M., & Douglas, D. (2016). Should students assessed as needing remedial mathematics take college-level quantitative courses instead? A randomized controlled trial. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 38(3), 578-598. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716649056

Ngo, F., & Kwon, W. W. (2015). Using multiple measures to make math placement decisions: Implications for access and success in community colleges. Research in Higher Education, 56(5), 442-470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-014-9352-9

Ran, F. X., & Lin, Y. (2019). The effects of corequisite remediation: Evidence from a statewide reform in Tennessee (CCRC Working Paper No. 115). Community College Research Center. https://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/media/k2/attachments/effects-corequisite-remediation-tennessee.pdf

Schak, O., Metzger, I., Bass, J., McCann, C., & English, J. (2017). Developmental education: Challenges and strategies for reform. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development. https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/opepd/education-strategies.pdf

Visher, M. G., Weiss, M. J., Weissman, E., Rudd, T., & Wathington, H. D. (2012). The effects of learning communities for students in developmental education: A synthesis of findings from six community colleges (ED533825). ERIC. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED533825.pdf

Downloads

Published

2022-03-11

Issue

Section

Feature Articles

How to Cite

Fully Scaling Up Corequisite Models in Math: Challenges and Successes. (2022). Journal of College Academic Support Programs, 4(2), 6. https://jcasp-ojs-txstate.tdl.org/jcasp/article/view/79

Similar Articles

1-10 of 82

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.