Equipping Student Academic Coaches to Effectively Engage First-Year Students in Corequisite Math Support Labs

Authors

  • Melody G Shumaker First Year Experience Program Columbus State University
  • Hassan M Hassani Department of Mathematics at Columbus State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58997/6.2pp4

Keywords:

emotional intelligence, emporium-based model, growth mindsets, motivational interviewing, problem-solving, training academic coaches

Abstract

Over the past few years at Columbus State University, the learning support math faculty and director have focused on the importance of training academic coaches to effectively engage students in corequisite support math with key practices implemented in an emporium-based model for our corequisite support math labs. This model consists of experienced math faculty as instructional facilitators and coordinators and student peers as academic coaches to provide support in the areas of coaching, tutoring, and mentoring. The purpose of this implementation is to empower our students to acquire knowledge, to strengthen interpersonal and academic skills, and to create a sense of belonging at the institution in order to attain career goals. To effectively engage students in these efforts, the learning support math faculty and director have focused on the implementation of solid training for our academic coaches based on best practices in the areas of growth mindsets, problem-solving, emotional intelligence, and motivational interviewing.

Author Biographies

  • Melody G Shumaker, First Year Experience Program Columbus State University

    is the director of the First Year Experience program and coordinator of Learning Support programs at Columbus State University. She has worked in higher education for 25 years in faculty and administrative roles. Dr. Shumaker’s work focuses on retention efforts for first-year students.

  • Hassan M Hassani, Department of Mathematics at Columbus State University

    is an assistant professor in the Department of Mathematics at Columbus State University. He holds three decades of experience in teaching, advising and mentoring university students. He teaches courses in quantitative reasoning, mathematical modeling, and college algebra. His research includes serving underprepared students.

References

Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 84.

Baldwin, A., Bunting, B. D., Daugherty, L., Lewis, L., & Steenbergh, T. A. (2020). Promoting belonging, growth mindset, and resilience to foster student success. National Resource Center for The First-Year Experience and Students in Transition, University of South Carolina.

Collier, P. (2017). Why peer mentoring is an effective approach for promoting college student success. Metropolitan Universities, 28(3), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.18060/21539

Dweck, C. (2016). What having a “growth mindset” actually means. Harvard Business Review, 13(2), 2–5.

Galagan, P., Hirt, M., & Vital, C. (2019). Capabilities for talent development: Shaping the future of the profession. Association for Talent Development.

Goleman, D. (2014a). What makes a leader: Why emotional intelligence matters. More Than Sound.

Goleman, D. (2014b). What it takes to achieve managerial success: Four facets of emotional intelligence epitomize the necessary competencies. Talent Development, 68(11), 48–52.

Machera, R. P., & Machera, P. C. (2017). Emotional intelligence in modifying and academic adjustment among first year university students in North Jordan. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 3(2), 135.

Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (1991). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people to change addictive behavior. The Guilford Press.

Nicoll, W. G. (2014). Developing transformative schools: A resilience-focused paradigm for education. International Journal of Emotional Education, 6(1), 47–65.

Sullivan, J. (2023). Six ways to screen job candidates for strategic thinking [Special issue]. Harvard Business Review, 24–26. https://hbr.org/2016/12/6-ways-to-screen-job-candidates-for-strategic-thinking

Wells, H., & Jones, A. (2018). Learning to change: The rationale for the use of motivational interviewing in higher education. Innovations in Education & Technology International, 55(1), 111–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2016.1198714

Xiao, F., Zhang, Z., Zhou, J., Wu, H., Zhang, L., Lin, M., & Lang, H. (2023). The relationship between a growth mindset and the learning engagement of nursing students: A structural equation modeling approach. Nursing Education in Practice, 73, 103796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103796

Yeager, D. D., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). Mindsets that promote resilience: When students believe that personal characteristics can be developed. Educational Psychologist, 47(4), 302–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.722805

Yeager, D. S., Hanselman, P., Paunesku, D., Hulleman, C., Dweck, C., Muller, C., & Duckworth, A. (2018). Where and for whom can a brief, scalable mindset intervention improve adolescents’ educational trajectories. PsyArXiv Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/md2qa

Zhao, J. J., & Zhao, S. Y. (2022). Creativity and innovation programs offered by AACSB-U.S. colleges of business: A web mining study. Journal of Education for Business, 97(5), 285–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2021.1934373

Downloads

Published

2024-05-31

How to Cite

Equipping Student Academic Coaches to Effectively Engage First-Year Students in Corequisite Math Support Labs. (2024). Journal of College Academic Support Programs, 6(2), 30–33. https://doi.org/10.58997/6.2pp4

Similar Articles

21-30 of 89

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.